|
Anthroponomy.com
ANTHROPONOMY
A NEW AND NECESSARY SCIENCE FOR WHAT PEOPLE ARE.
"... people, man, human, person, autistic, humanity, sociopath, male, homo-sapiens, woman, female, citizen, human being, animal, human race, race, species, humankind, mankind, humanoid, earthling, men, ...etc.."
|
|
- Scientific definitions
- Human Beings
- Human primates
- Homo-sapiens/sociopaths
- Autism
- Asperger's
- Autistics
LINKS
- Anthroponomy.org
- GistMill.com
CONTACT
- 'director' at here
|
What is anthroponomy about?
Anthroponomy is about 'what' people are.
What is "Equal"?
Each person is uniquely individual. This is simply evident to all. No man is created equal, not what-so-ever. What is equal, what has been sensed as an equality amongst all people, what the Forefathers of the United States of America and what Karl Marx felt as an equality, is this:
All living things suffer equally.
This is the exact, precise, and summarized equality which is actually true, and it is this equality which causes the sense and feeling of 'equality' amongst people.
Anthroponomy is based on this truth:
For suffering is suffering and is complete unto itself to that which suffers.
What are people?
What defines people is not their physical traits, but exactly the intangible traits by which people tend to define themselves, and which, in fact, do determine what a person is.
Although we all appear to be the same - that we each have the physical characteristics of a homo-sapiens intelligent mammal - there are actually two major types of people - or species of sentience - on this planet; Human and Autistic.
Both of these sentient species have 'spectrums'.
Humans range from what is called "sociopathic" - or a homo-sapiens - to "Human Beings" - who have the full array of human traits (quality) in full abundance (quantity). Sociopaths - or homo-sapiens - lack the traits (quality) which define what is human, or lack sufficient levels (quantity) of those traits, and so are unable to qualify as 'human'. Without the defining traits of 'human', or in the absence of sufficient levels of these defining traits, an individual cannot be defined as 'human' ... which leaves the only definition available; homo-sapiens.
Autistics range from what is called "low-functioning autistic" to "high-functioning autistic" - which higher-functioning is more prevalent in the spectrum called "Asperger's syndrome".
Most of the populace of people on this planet are human. About ten percent are not human, but are either homo-sapiens or autistic. Both homo-sapiens and autistics emulate human behavior in order to fit in to human society. As such, it can be very difficult, at times, to see any difference between those autistics and homo-sapiens that are most able to emulate human behavior.
It should be noted that intelligence is a trait of the intelligent mammal, homo-sapiens, and is not a defining trait of either human or autistic - although is does appear that autism does produce a higher degree per capita of intelligence or giftedness within that species of sentience.
However, anthroponomy, the science of people, is yet in its infancy, and much is yet to be determined as scientific fact. The basis and principles of anthroponomy here defined are the groundwork from which the applied science of anthroponomy can - and must, if people and this planet are to survive and have well-being - be produced.
What does "anthroponomy" mean and how is it a science?
"Anthroponomy is a word combined from the Greek word "anthropo-" which essentially means "human" - or "people", in the presence of the greater understanding provided by anthroponomy itself - and the scientific suffix "-nomy" which is used for a science of numbers and measurements - such as "economy". The suffix "-logy" means "logic", but is not a numerical science; hence there are the quasi-sciences of psychology and anthropology, which are investigations into actual empirical phenomenon, but without scientific direction into the very broad subject matters they do investigate. Neither psychology nor anthropology are true sciences; although the empirical phenomenon is true, the investigations are without consensus of definition, agreement of the phenomenon itself, or a specific mathematical/logical language to replace the highly interpretable spoken/written languages, which words of are vastly imprecise, biased, possess controversial emotional and intellectual nuances, and possess multiple definitions which may be very similar ... such that consensus can never be reached and argumentation is circular and unproductive.
Anthroponomy is an exact science. It is not subject to opinion, debate, argument, bias, or any other thing but fact. As time progresses, the scientific capabilities of this world will be able to use the principles of anthroponomy to objectively measure exactly what - not 'who' - an individual person is. Methods of testing intangible traits - such as the concept of 'compassion' - will be as repeatably accurate as measuring the equally intangible trait of intelligence (called "I.Q." or "Intelligence Quotient") by assigning a numerical score or value to such intangible traits.
Anthroponomy, like any new science, is - as of this writing - in its infancy, having just been born. The work required is immense, there is no room for opinion nor mistake, and the circumstance of this time in history mandate a rapid progress of the science - which necessity for the highest expedience and complete accuracy automatically makes for a most daunting task.
Anthroponomy.com is the official website of the exact and only science of anthroponomy; any other system of logic is not anthroponomy, but must have a separate definition of its own science. Anthroponomy is exactly this science, and no other.
What and who is anthroponomy?
As of this writing, April 20, 2008, anthroponomy is officially founded by me, Richard Skenderian, the author and 'owner' of this website. There is, at this time, no other contributors. I am Autistic, specifically having 'Asperger's Syndrome' (or, being "AS"), with a spatial-relations intelligence (right hemisphere of the brain) immeasurable because of its high level, and so far uninterpolated, yet above standardized test ceilings of IQ 190, above high-IQ society test ceilings of IQ 212, and self-estimated at IQ 220. My left-hemisphere intelligence is measured by standardized testing as IQ 141. I am, as of this writing, 45 years old. I have lived many different lifestyles and have investigated into life and existence myself, independently, beginning at an unknown age - approximately 4 years old.
Anthroponomy is very much open to contribution, and requires much contribution; however, I retain official 'directorship' as its founder, that the science of anthroponomy shall continue without personal ego advancement, bias, or compromise - and with full integrity and selfless dedication to truth. The science of anthroponomy does not acknowledge efforts by others who may have different vested interests or ulterior motives and agendas other than the truth as contributors to anthroponomy. Any other efforts conducted without the sanction of the science of anthroponomy must use a separate term of definition for that separate science.
Contribution will be open, and initially set up as a forum on the website, Anthroponomy.org.
Funding for the science of anthroponomy will be invested, first and foremost, into a physical center for work/study and into Internet presence.
|
Anthroponomical Speculations:
- Likely, notable homo-sapiens (sociopaths):
- The Beatnik writers
- Picasso
- George Bush
- Benjamin Franklin
- Leonardo Da Vinci
- Chilren's clinics directors
- Madonna (pop singer)
- Likely, notable Human Beings:
- Karl Marx
- Thomas Jefferson
- Shakespeare
- Vivaldi
- Thomas Edison
- Confucious
- Isaac Asimov
- Likely, notable Autistics:
- Abraham Lincoln
- Monet
- Rene Descartes
- [M'Ham Heb] (Jesus Christ)
- Isaac Newton
- Bobby Fischer
- Emily Dickinson
- Autistic, Human, or sociopath?
- Ghandi
- Ralf Nader
- John Lennon
- Prince (pop singer)
- Napolean
- Charles Bukowski
|